How Are Stamper Family Related to Scotland and Ireland

Should disabled children be used as props to make men with sexual fetishes feel better? It doesn't seem like a difficult question, does it?

"At no point, while I was coming to terms with how my [severely disabled] daughter's future was set to unfold, did I look to detect myself in a position where I would exist forced to remind my elected representatives most something as basic every bit my vulnerable girl's demand for aforementioned-sex care.

Anxieties about her having to endure acts of negligence, or possibly even cruelty, at the hands of an unprofessional person, once I am gone, have haunted some of my sleepless nights. However, I have been consoled with the cognition that regulations and safeguarding policies would be in identify to offer her protection from bad actors.

But what happens when somewhere along the line the differences betwixt the sexes become artificially blurred, and the safeguarding that was in place tin no longer be relied upon because of proposed reforms to current law?"

The higher up quote is part of the heartfelt plea of a mother of a disabled daughter. We know that women and girls are vulnerable to male sexual violence, nosotros know that men commit 98% of sex offences and we know that disabled children are three to iv times more than probable to feel abuse.

We merely don't seem to care.

The Un Population Fund has highlighted how "in a report by the African Kid Policy Forum of violence confronting children with disabilities, nearly every young person interviewed had been sexually abused at to the lowest degree once – and most more than than once".

Once they accomplish machismo, the statistics according to research past DAME Mag are terrifying:

"Fourscore-3 percent of disabled women experience rape or abuse, oft at the easily of caretakers. And without a manner to study their violations, the [perpetrators] often go unpunished."

The magazine'due south Victoria Brownworth argued that (in the U.s.a.)"77% of rapes and sexual assaults were not reported to police. The enormity of that number suggests that within the context of inability, where so many victims may not even take access to language, or where the person they would report to is the same person perpetuating the assaults (and on whom they depend for their almost bones care), the number may be perilously shut to 100 percent."

Alongside the significant gamble of sexual violence, we know that girls and women experience an indignity and a trauma when they are forced to let a male to undress them and touch their vulva, breasts or anus when they do not consent and do not want this touch on. Sex is important.

Having become disabled as a teenager myself, it can feel similar lodge has sentenced you to suffer at the hands of men. The figures and the possibilities of your future are stark. People look away at the obvious risks, they deny that y'all too need dignity, they merits "non all men".

And while information technology isn't all men, it's also not just vii bad ones – they wouldn't take the time to abuse all of these children and women.

'In Ireland, a report analysing data from 14 rape crisis centres shows that nigh one-half of the surveyed survivors with disabilities disclosed that they were subjected to sexual violence during babyhood (48%), while ane in ten disclosed that they were subjected to sexual violence both as adults and as children (ten%).

Individuals with disabilities who use rape crunch centre services are more probable to have been subjected to multiple incidents of sexual violence than those with no disabilities (39% compared with 25%)."

Although it'southward difficult to obtain data on disabled children as previously it hasn't been seen as of import enough to collect, the information which is emerging is showing a similar blueprint across nations. Very vulnerable children and adults, particularly those who struggle to communicate, are seen equally targets past predators. These predatory males will use careers where they can have access to these vulnerable children in guild to abuse.

For example, show was given to the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry that a potential sex offender was existence employed and moved around children's homes, including a home for disabled children.

"Mr Dolan, former assistant surface area manager for the Glasgow S social work team, told the hearing in Edinburgh: "a homo, who I don't want to name, worked as a residential care worker for the local authority. He is now a convicted sex offender."

Staff were expressing concerns about him and it seems that he got moved from a children's dwelling house to a dwelling house for children with disabilities in the Pollokshields area and they were concerned how he had managed to go this. I am aware that this individual seemed to exist very close to one of the about senior managers for the residential establishment".

Frequently men will move into positions where they can have access to their targets. In May 2021 Dorrion Etienne was imprisoned for targeting and sexually abusing two learning-disabled girls at their schoolhouse.

In August 2021 a former deputy headmaster and a caput of care at a special needs school in Lincolnshire who raped and assaulted girl pupils over the course of 12 years were jailed for more than 23 years.

In Nov 2021 Robin James Elms was convicted and sentenced later he "targeted a child with special needs during a entrada of abuse in individual homes where he worked as a freelance nanny and babysitter. He picked on children he idea were too young to speak upward or who had learning difficulties and autism, training entire families in lodge to commit his abuse".

Also in November 2021 it was reported that George Holden, "a former Derbyshire teacher and professional clown expects to dice behind bars after being jailed for abusing young children. The court heard his previous convictions included sexually abusing bullheaded and disabled children while working every bit a instructor at a special school".

In December 2021 Brian Rudgley, an 83-yr-old retired head instructor with years of experience working with children with special educational needs was imprisoned for sexually abusing a learning-disabled girl.

We have seen this design in institutions like sports clubs, charities and the Church building to proper name just a few. Predators will move to where they can get to their prey. Yet still, politicians are behaving like such behaviour is beyond the realms of possibility. I am sick of them playing dumb and putting the wellbeing of the disabled at risk.

Indeed, information technology is once again being proposed by politicians that male feelings and male egos need to exist prioritised and protected by law above the needs of the vulnerable, and those who likewise frequently experience sexual abuse at the hands of males. Nosotros are non fifty-fifty allowed to name the pattern – male sexual violence – in case it offends men.

Language had been inverse to obscure reality. Parent P, who wished to remain anonymous, pointed out that "lots of people won't think twice about a form but asking most gender, non sex as well and as well think these terms are interchangeable. The erosion and hijacking of our rights is so insidious".

When it's a class deciding what developed will be touching your child'southward genitals, the difference between sex and gender identity is put in much sharper relief. Same-sex intendance is the almost basic of safeguards and provides dignity, we should be able to cull it for ourselves and our relatives.

Nevertheless, information technology commonly appears that NHS policies have been written co-ordinate to Stonewall's version of the law rather than the Equality Act 2010. NHS Lanarkshire's "Supporting Trans Staff in the Workplace" dictates that employees:

"ensure Trans staff are treated as being of the gender in which they are living irrespective of whether they have undergone whatever hormonal or surgical treatment or take a Gender Recognition Certificate. It is unacceptable for colleagues and managers to pass up to recognise, for any period of time, a member of staff as belonging to the gender in which they are currently living."

Translated, a cross-dressing human being who gets aroused in women's apparel is to be treated as a woman, and this includes allowing him access to disabled girls' naked bodies.

The Equality Act 2010 makes it acceptable to discriminate on the basis of sex if there is a legitimate aim – this is known every bit a Full general Occupational Qualification (GOQ). If women and girls are to be naked it was widely accepted, before Stonewall poisoned the well, that a GOQ would automatically employ.

NHS Lanarkshire has pre-empted challenge on this signal and allowable staff that male person feelings come above the law in this regard. It declares that:

"the Equality Act 2010 provides express exemptions for GOQ positions to restrict access to members of a particular gender [wrong, read "sex"]. These exemptions tin can simply be applied in order to achieve a legitimate operational need.

All efforts should be made to enable Trans employees to work in positions, including those covered by General Occupational Qualifications, consistent with the gender with which they identify.

Where a person has a gender recognition certificate they must exist regarded every bit being that gender for the purposes of GOQ positions. As the gender history of an employee is a matter of strictest confidentiality, this information should never be shared with service users."

This clandestine-keeping nearly (more often than not) males' true sex, identity, and past means the scenario could arise that parents place their severely disabled not-verbal teenage daughter in a short respite care, thinking she will receive intimate intendance and be attended to at night by a woman, when in reality a man who gets angry by cross-dressing has put on women'southward apparel and is repeatedly washing the girl's vulva.

Is that sexual abuse? The young girl will feel violated, volition feel abused, will be traumatised. The parents will feel lied to, and wonder if they can always trust the care of their girl to Lanarkshire NHS once more.

Allan Petrie, the chairperson of Glenlaw Parent/Carer Back up Group, has written to Shona Robison, the Cabinet Secretarial assistant for Social Justice, Housing and Local Government to raise parental concerns effectually the intendance of their disabled children, noting that "trans" is at present an umbrella term encompassing all manner of groups including drag queens, crossdressers and "midlings", whatsoever those might exist.

(Googling produces zip useful.)

It'due south also argued within the LGB/T/Q/+ community that a range of extreme (and even illegal) sexual practices grouped under the term "kink" vest under the trans/LGBTQ+ "umbrella".

The Q in LGBTQ+ (the official preferred term of people like the Scottish Greens) already stands for Queer, a term which organisations similar Stonewall are very shy about defining in any meaningful manner but appears to implicitly embrace "kink", as beingness outwith "perceived norms" and "specific labels".

Or put another way, it means whatever you desire it to hateful. Christina Richards – a transwoman who is Pb Psychologist and Head of Psychology at the UK's foremost "gender identity clinic", the Tavistock in London – has chosen for many extreme and vehement sexual practices to be normalised and no longer classified as paraphilias – conditions "characterized by abnormal sexual desires, typically involving extreme or dangerous activities".

(Ane such practice is "ageplay", which Richards describes equally "an developed identifying as a baby or young child, and is also known equally adult baby/diaper lover (ABDL) or infantilism. There may be a sexual aspect… associated with humiliation", while denying it has whatsoever link to paedophilia.)

Mr Petrie explained that to the minister:

"Our children are some of the most vulnerable children alive, they are non-mobile and non-verbal, they require 24 hr care including intimate care, as such we require to put our trust in professionals, at the moment we use the equality act to ensure that intendance is carried out past the aforementioned biological sex activity as our child, this is not just about safety just as well our children's nobility.

Notwithstanding if the Scottish regime continue with this Act then ANY man tin cocky-place as a female person exist given a job within the intendance sector and if we refused to allow them to give our child intimate intendance on the bases of their biological sex then we could face prosecution under the proposed Detest Criminal offence Bill."

Research past NSPCC Learning together with Coventry Academy and the Ann Craft Trust presented the universalism of these parental anxieties around the care of their disabled children. One parent respondent described how

"Nosotros had respite at home and we installed cameras in the firm for that reason, until they went. Nothing always happened just it was just for me for those ii hours while they were in that location. My son was so young, he still wouldn't be able to explain. So I would check it every time that I would come habitation. Just then I knew he was safe."

The inquiry highlighted how "parents whose children had circuitous needs raised particular concerns regarding how incredibly hard information technology was to teach their children about problems such equally condom touch in their intimate care, puberty and changes in their bodies and about sexual abuse. Their greatest fears were that their kid would not be able to communicate if they felt dangerous. One parent explained that her son used Makaton to communicate, nevertheless in that location were no staff in his schoolhouse that could use Makaton. Every bit a result the child had no means of communicating with anyone".

The sexual corruption of disabled children and young adults is so widespread that the NSPCC aslope the clemency Triangle has adult a communication arrangement for children to limited abuse. Triangle highlighted that earlier their intervention, children who used symbol vocabulary to communicate could "communicate about the national curriculum but cannot say 'leave me alone'."

Due to the fact that disabled children did not have access to specific symbols which could communicate sexual abuse, safeguarding experts and investigators would sometimes accept to manus describe images and thus accusations of coaching the kid could be made. This added to non-exact children being perceived as weak witnesses and afterward cases not being prosecuted.

Consequently it increased the targeting of such children by perpetrators. Triangle has enabled disabled children and young people to go legal redress for crimes committed against them, past enabling disabled children to tell someone what's being washed to them. Every bit office of developing the images, Triangle

"asked experienced interviewers about how immature children and nonspeaking children take communicated about abuse. [They've] included images for a range of words that children use when they don't know the 'right' word.

For children being interviewed using AAC, it may exist more appropriate to offer them not-specific images rather than explicit ones which could exist perceived as leading or coaching the child. For example, although the epitome set includes 'erection' and 'ejaculation', for young children it may be more advisable that they accept access to the images for 'willy', 'difficult' and 'squirt'."

Yes, in our society we've had to develop a way for severely disabled children who may have mental ages of vi to 8 to say"willy", "hard" and "squirt".

Once communication has been enabled the struggle to participate in the justice organization doesn't stop there. As well as access to advice, concrete access to the courts is all the same a barrier as just 2% of UK courts are currently accessible to disabled people. This, frankly, is a denial of cardinal rights and what exclusion really looks similar.

Aslope the obvious safeguarding issues and the need to maintain dignity for the disabled is the fact that a male carer would retraumatise disabled girls who have already been sexually abused by men. Ann Due west commented that "our disabled daughter was seriously sexually assaulted. We were assured she would ever have women back up staff particularly equally she needs assistance with all her personal care. Well I'm non remotely reassured, in fact I'm terrified for her future. This is so wrong on every level'."

It is by and large understood that women and girls who have been sexually assaulted and or raped past men detect the presence of and touch of men re-traumatising, and this is no dissimilar if the women or girl has a disability. In fact it may be exaggerated because that man might be touching your vulva, breasts and other parts of your body. The statistics on corruption are stark – UNICEF estimates that children with disabilities are three to four times more likely to experience physical and sexual violence.

Why would a human desire to exercise this? If he doesn't care about the potential serious impact he volition have on the disabled daughter or woman, should he be in a caring position at all? Since when has it been adequate to employ disabled children as props to arouse men?

To well-nigh people it is astonishing that questioning a homo touching your non-verbal disabled female person child's genitals could be a criminal offence, still in Scotland information technology is about to become a hate crime.Why are politicians willing to re-traumatise potential abuse victims to fulfil men'south fantasies?

.

Dr EM is a disabled, feminist writer and historian. She writes under a pen name due to threats to her safety and tweets as @PankhurstEM.

gonzalezsherting1989.blogspot.com

Source: https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-silence-of-the-sacrificial-lambs/comment-page-2/

Share this post